JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 26, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Sala Plena

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se dispone SUSPENDER los términos en el expediente RDL-034 correspondiente al control automático de constitucionalidad del Decreto Ley 902 de 2017, por el cual se adoptan medidas para facilitar la implementación de la Reforma Rural Integral contemplada en el Acuerdo Final en materia de tierras, específicamente el procedimiento para el acceso y la formalización y el Fondo de Tierras.

Se establece que dicha suspensión se mantiene hasta tanto la Corte decida sobre la constitucionalidad del Acto Legislativo 01 de 2017, expediente RPZ-003 y decrete la reanudación del presente proceso.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. SUSPENDER los terminos en el expediente RDL-034, correspondientes al control automatico de constitucionalidad del Decreto Ley 902 de 2017.
  2. SEGUNDO. Esta suspension se mantendra hasta tanto la Corte Constitucional decida sobre la constitucionalidad del Acto Legislativo 01 de 2017 (expediente RPZ-003), y decrete la reanudacion del proceso RDL 034.
  3. TERCERO. La suspension aqui decretada no impide la practica de pruebas en el proceso.
  4. CUARTO. La Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional realizara las anotaciones correspondientes en los expedientes mencionados.
  5. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela